Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn, the party of hungry children Ian McDonald skrifar 22. mars 2024 12:31 Now that some time has passed since the new collective agreement was signed between the broad alliance of trade unions, Samtök Atvinnulífsins and the Icelandic government. The dust has settled, people have had the chance to read and understand the substance of the agreement and how it will help working people over the coming years. This agreement promises to inject substantial amounts of tax-free disposable income into the pockets of working-class individuals and families, by increasing child benefit payments, lowering housing costs, lowering the cost of living by ensuring that the government reduces interest rates, and not least of all by making primary school meals free. It is on this last point that there has been objection to, particularly from Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn, and specifically (and vocally) from Oli Björn Kárason, a high-ranking member of the party. My immediate reaction to hearing that a member of the independence party doesn´t believe that it is the responsibility of the state to.....feed children..... was just a sigh and a shrug. But of course. That fits entirely with the ethos and brutal austerity politics of his chosen ideology. But then I thought a little deeper. This is a man who has been in the highest levels of Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn for a very long time. He has stuck with them through scandal after scandal, corruption, nepotism, public embarrasments and illegality. Through rampant cuts to public services and the measurable worsening of quality of life for the people he is paid to serve. And through all that, this man has held his tongue and not raised his head above the parapet. But the issue of ensuring that children have full bellies and that their families do not have to worry about the spiralling cost of meals is apparently one that he is willing to stand up in public and voice his opposition to. This is something that Óli Björn (and others) are willing to go on the record against and mark his part in Icelandic political history. To not believe that feeding children should be accepted as a bare minumum standard of care and decency in our society. That parents who are already struggling to make ends meet should be forced to scrape and save what little disposable income they have to ensure that their children aren‘t going hungry. And if they can´t afford it? Well i guess then work two jobs and pay the difference? I am well aware that the objections to increases in welfare such as this are always dressed up in political language, jargon and double-speak. The implication that somehow the Icelandic government does not have the money for this, or that it will result in inevitable cuts elsewhere. The debate surrounding free school meals for children is not merely a matter of economics; it's a litmus test for the moral conscience of our leaders. Yet, time and again, we see certain politicians barricading themselves behind bureaucratic jargon and hollow justifications, conveniently forgetting the dire realities faced by countless families struggling to put food on the table. These politicians, ensconced in their ivory towers of privilege, fail to comprehend the harsh truth that for many children, the school lunch may be their only nutritious meal of the day. By denying them this basic necessity, these politicians are complicit in perpetuating a cycle of poverty and hunger that stifles the potential of entire generations. Let's be unequivocal: objecting to free school meals for children is not a political stance; it's a moral failing. It's a betrayal of the fundamental duty of elected officials to safeguard the welfare of their constituents, especially the most marginalized among them. As a British ex-pat, my mind is inevitably drawn to comparisons with my native country, where during the covid-19 lockdowns, the Conservative government refused to feed children who were in lockdown and could not attend school. In that case it took a premier league footballer who started a public awareness campaign to pressure the government into sending food to hungry children. And yes. That is just as dystopian as it sounds. Make no mistake, that same ideaolgy is at work here, Sjalfstæðisflokkurinn are simply a bit further up the road than the British Conservative party. But the end point is the same. As citizens, we must hold these politicians accountable for their abhorrent stance on free school meals. We must demand that they prioritize humanity over politics, empathy over ideology. We must remind them that their duty is to serve the people, not their own self-interests. The author is a manufacturing worker. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Kjaraviðræður 2023-24 Mest lesið Hvað fær Ísland fyrir Seyðisfjörð? Ólafur Margeirsson Skoðun Hvernig styðja skal við árangur í Efra-Breiðholti Sæmundur Árni Hermannsson Skoðun Kópavogur fjölgar kennurum og fjárfestir í framtíð barna Ásdís Kristjánsdóttir Skoðun Áskorun til stjórnar RÚV: Rekið fréttastjórann Einar Steingrímsson Skoðun Það gengur svo vel hjá okkur! Kristján Freyr Halldórsson Skoðun Leigubremsan og vönduð lagasetning Gunnar Ármannsson Skoðun Ertu þroskaheft? Áslaug Þorsteinsdóttir Skoðun Bitna kjarasamningar kennara á börnunum okkar? Sigrún Ólöf Ingólfsdóttir Skoðun Frá gullsöltum til líftæknilyfja Hrönn Stefánsdóttir Skoðun Börn eiga ekki að bera ábyrgð á vandamálum fullorðinna Elísabet Heiða Valdemarsdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun „Raflítri“ Hvað kostar bensínlítraígildi? Sigurður Ingi Friðleifsson skrifar Skoðun Orð skipta máli Guðrún Jóna Guðlaugsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Tóbaksfyrirtækin eiga ekki að skrifa lögin Vala Smáradóttir,Jóhanna Kristjánsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Er ríkið að styrkja sveitarstjórnarstigið – en veikja undirstöður þess? Sigríður Hjaltadóttir skrifar Skoðun Að skattleggja fjarlægðir og búsetu fólks Jón Bjarnason skrifar Skoðun Ertu þroskaheft? Áslaug Þorsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Börn eiga ekki að bera ábyrgð á vandamálum fullorðinna Elísabet Heiða Valdemarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvað fær Ísland fyrir Seyðisfjörð? Ólafur Margeirsson skrifar Skoðun Gerum gott betra – þorum að horfa á allar hliðar Elísabet Reynisdóttir skrifar Skoðun Það gengur svo vel hjá okkur! Kristján Freyr Halldórsson skrifar Skoðun Hver er framtíð litlu hjúkrunarheimilanna á landsbyggðinni? Eydís Inga Sigurjónsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Skammsýni eða skynsemi? Skúli Mogensen skrifar Skoðun Mjúkt net og snjallrassar Unnar Geir Unnarsson skrifar Skoðun Frá gullsöltum til líftæknilyfja Hrönn Stefánsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Orð eiga að hafa merkingu og undirskriftir að skipta máli Guðmundur Halldór Björnsson skrifar Skoðun Hvernig styðja skal við árangur í Efra-Breiðholti Sæmundur Árni Hermannsson skrifar Skoðun 2,5% fyrir alla – nema höfuðstól húsnæðislánanna? Friðrik Björgvinsson skrifar Skoðun Kópavogur fjölgar kennurum og fjárfestir í framtíð barna Ásdís Kristjánsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvað kostar stjórnun okkur? Maríanna Magnúsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Forsendubresturinn sem varð að friðarkaupum Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Leigubremsan og vönduð lagasetning Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar Skoðun Leigubremsa er almannahagsmunamál Yngvi Ómar Sigrúnarson skrifar Skoðun Tímamót Samúel Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Næsta verðhækkun á ekki að vera sjálfgefin Ingvar Freyr Ingvarsson skrifar Skoðun Börn eftir pöntun Fæðingarorlofssjóðs Bryndís Haraldsdóttir skrifar Skoðun 100 ár af dellu Helgi Tómasson skrifar Skoðun Áskorun til ríkisstjórnarinnar: Ekki fækka borgarfulltrúm úr 23 Í 15! Guðni Freyr Öfjörð skrifar Skoðun Maðurinn sem hringdi í óvininn Einar Bárðarson skrifar Skoðun Samráð sem breytir Karólína Helga Símonardóttir skrifar Skoðun Um bakara og smiði. Hlaðvörp og skráning þeirra hjá Fjölmiðlanefnd Elfa Ýr Gylfadóttir skrifar Sjá meira
Now that some time has passed since the new collective agreement was signed between the broad alliance of trade unions, Samtök Atvinnulífsins and the Icelandic government. The dust has settled, people have had the chance to read and understand the substance of the agreement and how it will help working people over the coming years. This agreement promises to inject substantial amounts of tax-free disposable income into the pockets of working-class individuals and families, by increasing child benefit payments, lowering housing costs, lowering the cost of living by ensuring that the government reduces interest rates, and not least of all by making primary school meals free. It is on this last point that there has been objection to, particularly from Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn, and specifically (and vocally) from Oli Björn Kárason, a high-ranking member of the party. My immediate reaction to hearing that a member of the independence party doesn´t believe that it is the responsibility of the state to.....feed children..... was just a sigh and a shrug. But of course. That fits entirely with the ethos and brutal austerity politics of his chosen ideology. But then I thought a little deeper. This is a man who has been in the highest levels of Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn for a very long time. He has stuck with them through scandal after scandal, corruption, nepotism, public embarrasments and illegality. Through rampant cuts to public services and the measurable worsening of quality of life for the people he is paid to serve. And through all that, this man has held his tongue and not raised his head above the parapet. But the issue of ensuring that children have full bellies and that their families do not have to worry about the spiralling cost of meals is apparently one that he is willing to stand up in public and voice his opposition to. This is something that Óli Björn (and others) are willing to go on the record against and mark his part in Icelandic political history. To not believe that feeding children should be accepted as a bare minumum standard of care and decency in our society. That parents who are already struggling to make ends meet should be forced to scrape and save what little disposable income they have to ensure that their children aren‘t going hungry. And if they can´t afford it? Well i guess then work two jobs and pay the difference? I am well aware that the objections to increases in welfare such as this are always dressed up in political language, jargon and double-speak. The implication that somehow the Icelandic government does not have the money for this, or that it will result in inevitable cuts elsewhere. The debate surrounding free school meals for children is not merely a matter of economics; it's a litmus test for the moral conscience of our leaders. Yet, time and again, we see certain politicians barricading themselves behind bureaucratic jargon and hollow justifications, conveniently forgetting the dire realities faced by countless families struggling to put food on the table. These politicians, ensconced in their ivory towers of privilege, fail to comprehend the harsh truth that for many children, the school lunch may be their only nutritious meal of the day. By denying them this basic necessity, these politicians are complicit in perpetuating a cycle of poverty and hunger that stifles the potential of entire generations. Let's be unequivocal: objecting to free school meals for children is not a political stance; it's a moral failing. It's a betrayal of the fundamental duty of elected officials to safeguard the welfare of their constituents, especially the most marginalized among them. As a British ex-pat, my mind is inevitably drawn to comparisons with my native country, where during the covid-19 lockdowns, the Conservative government refused to feed children who were in lockdown and could not attend school. In that case it took a premier league footballer who started a public awareness campaign to pressure the government into sending food to hungry children. And yes. That is just as dystopian as it sounds. Make no mistake, that same ideaolgy is at work here, Sjalfstæðisflokkurinn are simply a bit further up the road than the British Conservative party. But the end point is the same. As citizens, we must hold these politicians accountable for their abhorrent stance on free school meals. We must demand that they prioritize humanity over politics, empathy over ideology. We must remind them that their duty is to serve the people, not their own self-interests. The author is a manufacturing worker.
Skoðun Er ríkið að styrkja sveitarstjórnarstigið – en veikja undirstöður þess? Sigríður Hjaltadóttir skrifar
Skoðun Börn eiga ekki að bera ábyrgð á vandamálum fullorðinna Elísabet Heiða Valdemarsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Hver er framtíð litlu hjúkrunarheimilanna á landsbyggðinni? Eydís Inga Sigurjónsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Orð eiga að hafa merkingu og undirskriftir að skipta máli Guðmundur Halldór Björnsson skrifar
Skoðun Áskorun til ríkisstjórnarinnar: Ekki fækka borgarfulltrúm úr 23 Í 15! Guðni Freyr Öfjörð skrifar
Skoðun Um bakara og smiði. Hlaðvörp og skráning þeirra hjá Fjölmiðlanefnd Elfa Ýr Gylfadóttir skrifar